Hey beauties! Today we’re diving deep into the world of MAC foundations with an in-depth look at their Studio Fix Tech Cream-To-Powder Foundation. As a long-time MAC fan and beauty blogger, I was excited to see this new formula hit the shelves. But with any product relaunch, there’s always a mix of hype and skepticism. Will it live up to the legacy of its predecessor? Is it worth the splurge for die-hard Studio Tech lovers and new customers alike?
To find out, I didn’t just test this foundation myself – I scoured over 60 reviews from real MAC customers of all ages and skin types. From oily-skinned twentysomethings to mature makeup mavens, these honest insights paint a full picture of how the Studio Fix Tech performs in the real world, beyond the sleek promo shots and in-store swatches.
So grab your beauty blender and let’s get into it! We’ll cover the good, the bad, and everything in between, so you can decide if this cream-to-powder compact deserves a starring role in your makeup bag.
First Impressions
Packaging & Formula Right off the bat, the Studio Fix Tech makes a luxe first impression with its sleek black compact. The product is housed in one compartment, with a sponge applicator tucked away separately – a hygienic touch that I appreciate. Popping it open, the cream-to-powder formula has a silky, almost moussey texture that glides onto the skin.
Several reviewers noted that a little goes a long way with this foundation. As Christine, 45-54, put it: “The coverage is medium to full. You have total control in how much you want to sheer it out or build it up.” This buildable formula seems to cater to a variety of coverage preferences, from a natural your-skin-but-better look to full glam.
Application: Techniques & Tips When it comes to applying the Studio Fix Tech, reviewers were split between using a brush or sponge. Some, like Cynthia K, 45-54, advocated for using a brush “as it was intended”, calling sponge application “user error”. Meanwhile, Stephie, 45-54, found that “using a sponge gives me a beautiful flawless finish more than the brush.”
The consensus seems to be that buffing the product in with a brush, whether stippling or swirling motions, yields the smoothest, most skin-like finish. Joy, 45-54, advises: “Swirl it on the mirror to really work it into the brush, then swirl it onto your skin. Start light and add more as needed.” Noted!
As for prep, reviewers like PL, 35-44, stressed the importance of pairing this foundation with the right primer, saying it “works best for this type of foundation.” Clearly, starting with a good base is key to getting the most out of the Studio Fix Tech’s cream-to-powder formula.
Coverage & Finish
Now for the million dollar question: how does this foundation actually look on the skin? The majority of reviews rave about the Studio Fix Tech’s natural, skin-like finish. As SK, 25-34, describes: “It looks very natural, yet gives me the coverage I need.”
Even self-proclaimed full coverage fanatics were impressed by how undetectable this foundation looked. Daisygirl, 55-64, shared: “It covers like a dream, it doesn’t oxidize, it doesn’t sit in fine lines, and it lasts all day! I set it with Studio Fix powder and my complexion looks flawless.
On the flip side, a few reviewers felt that the coverage was lacking compared to the original Studio Tech formula. Tabby, 35-44, lamented that “It might as well be a tinted moisturizer. It does nothing and has to be reapplied after only a few hours.”
Of course, coverage is subjective and depends on individual skin concerns and preferences. But overall, the Studio Fix Tech seems to nail that elusive balance of coverage and naturalness that so many of us seek in a foundation.
Wear Time & Longevity Speaking of lasting all day, wear time was another hot topic in the reviews. With a cream-to-powder formula, you’d expect this foundation to hold up well throughout the day, especially for oily skin types. And for many reviewers, that was indeed the case.
NoelMB, 25-34, attests that the “durability through the day even when i’m working outside is exceptional.” Similarly, GG, 35-44, says the Studio Fix Tech “stays on all day for me. I have oily skin, and I wouldn’t say I like reapplying. This product gives me exactly what I need.”
However, some reviewers found that the long-wearing claims didn’t quite hold up. Bfly0510, 45-54, noted that while it “looked great and natural when applied”, it “transferred to much especially on my nose area and broke up by my chin. I work long hours but this could be good for other kind of purposes.”
Mfgs, 25-34, added: “I expected it to be more long-lasting. It transfers a lot as well. After a few hours, you can see that part of the product is gone from your face.”
So while the Studio Fix Tech seems to have impressive staying power for some, it may not be the most transfer-proof or mask-friendly foundation out there. As with any base product, setting with powder and refreshing with your method of choice (blotting papers, touch-up powder, setting spray, etc.) can help extend the wear.
Shade Range & Undertones MAC is known for their extensive shade ranges, and the Studio Fix Tech is no exception, with a whopping 30+ shades to choose from. However, finding your perfect match in this new formula seems to be hit or miss based on the reviews.
A common complaint amongst long-time Studio Tech wearers was that the shades in the new Studio Fix Tech ran darker, redder, and more orange-toned. VK, 45-54, noticed this shift, sharing: “I am NC30. I have gone through drastic skin lightening changes automatically. From NC42 to now NC30. I am Indian, light to medium skin tone. …If you can figure out your right shade, I suggest go to the counter and shade match, you will not be disappointed.”
Other reviewers, like Ms Tish, 55-64, and Stephie, 45-54, had better luck, finding their usual MAC shades to be a perfect match in the Studio Fix Tech. It seems like the batch inconsistencies that some have experienced with other MAC foundations may be at play here.
The bottom line?
Swatching in store (or taking advantage of MAC’s generous return policy for online orders) is a must to find your true match in this formula. And if you’re a ride-or-die for a particular shade in the old Studio Tech, be prepared for some trial and error.
Skin Type Compatibility Another key factor in any foundation’s success is how well it plays with different skin types. The Studio Fix Tech’s cream-to-powder formula seems to be a hit for oily and combo skin, controlling shine without looking flat or dry.
Cinnamon, 25-34, shares: “I have combination skin with visual redness. This foundation keeps my skin hydrated without creating excess oils. The coverage is superior and build-able. Blends easy for a flawless look.” TucsonGal, 65+, with dry skin, also found that it “did not feel dry or crepey and has a very lovely finish.”
On the other hand, some reviewers with dry or mature skin types found the formula to be less forgiving. Kmf, 35-44, says it “doesn’t go on as smoothly & requires more foundation for adequate coverage and it is not as crease resistant, even using a Mac brush to apply it.
The takeaway? As with any foundation, your mileage may vary depending on your individual skin type and concerns. But overall, the Studio Fix Tech seems to be a solid choice for those on the oilier side who still crave a skin-like, satin finish.
Value & Price Point
At $37 for 0.42 oz of product, the Studio Fix Tech sits comfortably in the prestige foundation price range. But is it worth the splurge? The reviews are mixed.
Some, like Mfgs, 25-34, felt that the compact “will end super quickly and you’ll have to buy more” and noted the lack of a refill option, saying MAC “should 100% change” this. Ola, 25-34, agrees: “Just please, MAC, upgrade the packaging to be more environmentally (and budget?) friendly!”
Others, like Special K, 55-64, felt that “even though it’s a bit pricey, MAC always offers specials.” And for many, like Chris, 45-54, the “quality of the products is why I return.”
Ultimately, value is relative and personal. But I have to agree that at this price point, a refillable compact option would be a welcome addition, both for our wallets and the planet. Something to consider, MAC!
The Discontinued Debate Perhaps the most polarizing aspect of the Studio Fix Tech launch was its implications for long-time fans of the original Studio Tech formula. Many reviewers expressed disappointment, frustration, and even anger at the discontinuation of their holy grail foundation.
M Layne, 45-54, shares a sentiment echoed by many: “I used Studio Tech NW43 for over a decade and received many compliments on my skin. When I heard it had been discontinued, I panicked. …Please, MAC, stop discontinuing products that your customers love. We won’t convert to replacement products that don’t meet the standard, we’ll just abandon your brand.”
Others, like April, 45-54, were less generous in their feedback: “WHAT is this ‘new’ formula? IT IS AWFUL. …I need the old mix back. …Why they changed it I have no idea. MAC – you’d be best served to change back to the original formula and put this in the garbage. DO NOT BUY. DO NOT RECOMMEND. ZERO STARS.”
Yikes. Clearly, there’s a lot of passion (and a little heartbreak) in the MAC community over this formula change. And I get it – when you find your perfect foundation, the idea of starting from scratch is daunting.
But here’s the thing: brands discontinue and reformulate products all the time. It’s frustrating, but it’s also an inevitable part of the beauty industry. And while I empathize with those mourning the loss of their beloved Studio Tech, I also think it’s important to approach the Studio Fix Tech as its own entity, rather than just a replacement.
Could MAC have handled the transition better, maybe by offering both formulas simultaneously or giving more of a heads up to loyal customers? Probably. But at the end of the day, the Studio Fix Tech should be judged on its own merits, not just in comparison to its predecessor.
Final Thoughts
So where does that leave us with the MAC Studio Fix Tech Cream-To-Powder Foundation? After poring over pages of reviews and weighing the pros and cons, I think it’s safe to say that this foundation is a solid choice for those seeking a buildable, natural-looking base with a satin finish.
It seems to perform best for oily to combo skin types and those who prefer a more skin-like look over a full-coverage beat. The shade range is extensive, but finding your perfect match may require some trial and error, especially for long-time Studio Tech devotees.
The wear time is impressive for most, but not completely transfer-proof or mask-friendly. And while the price point is on par with other prestige foundations, the lack of a refill option is a bit of a bummer.
As for the Studio Tech vs. Studio Fix Tech debate? I get the disappointment and frustration. It’s never fun to have your go-to product taken away. But I also think it’s worth giving the Studio Fix Tech a fair shot on its own terms. You may be pleasantly surprised!
Ultimately, foundation is such a personal product. What works for one person may be a total flop for another. My advice? If you’re intrigued by the Studio Fix Tech, snag a sample or take advantage of MAC’s return policy and give it a whirl. Wear it for a full day, put it through its paces, and see how it performs for you. That’s the only way to know for sure if it deserves a place in your makeup bag.
And remember, beauties: at the end of the day, makeup should be fun. It’s about experimenting, expressing yourself, and finding what makes you feel like your best self. So don’t get too bogged down in the drama or the pursuit of a mythical “perfect” product. Embrace the journey and enjoy the ride!
I hope this in-depth review of the MAC Studio Fix Tech Cream-To-Powder Foundation has been helpful and informative. If you’ve tried this foundation, I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. And if you have any other burning beauty questions or product review requests, hit me up! Until next time, stay gorgeous!
Xoxo, Your Resident Beauty Guru
Buy on Amazon: Here
